Wednesday, February 07, 2007

V-Day

This entry is dedicated to two new little unborn souls. May they grow gracefully in a world that values human beings equally.

* * * *


I recently watched the CBC series “The Greatest Canadian”. You may recall how these short documentaries on some of Canada’s Most Fabulous gripped the nerds of the nation back in the autumn of 2004. From Trudeau to Suzuki, Fredrick Banting to Terry Fox, I was humbled and inspired (and even got a little teary-eyed) by some of the “greatness” that has come from Canada.

But something was missing for me.

In the series, we had a minor amount of diversity in terms of religion, ethnicity and physical ability. We saw leadership from political, athletic, environmental and medical perspectives. But missing from the Top 10 Greatest Canadians were women.

Despite Canadian’s inability to recognize fabulous females, Canada has a history of innovative female leadership. If you have any doubts, I’ll name a few examples:

Geneticist Carrie Derick (1862-1941) fought against discrimination throughout her career, to become the first female professor in Canada, right here in Montreal.

Artist Emily Carr (1871-1945) made a monumental contribution to Canadian art through her paintings and literary works, while her appreciation for nature was unfashionable in a time of increasing industrialization. She was a woman ahead of her time.


Indigenous leader Mary John (1913-2004) of northern B.C. was a social activist and role model of integrity, strength and gentleness. She survived residential schooling to create aboriginal community programs, which aided in the preservation of Carrier language and culture.

The list could go on: Sandra Schmirler, Margaret Atwood, Andrienne Clarkson and Laura Secord have all made monumental contributions to our nation. Yet, as Canadians, we failed to recognize this when we placed our votes two years ago. Instead we voted Don Cherry into the Top 10, and consequently administered a metaphorical slap across the face to every female in this nation.

Many people will rationalize this by saying the lack of female representation was simply a reflection of the past, and these days we don’t have the same imbalances.

But really, how far have we evolved?


Gender inequity is evident in our current cultural and political systems. Music videos, the sonnets of our time, continue to objectify and exploit women. The recent wave of shows like Deal or No Deal and Show Me the Money (now thankfully extinct) are proof of equality de-evolution with women used as “sexy backdrops.” In advertising, soaps, sprays and other “feminine hygiene” products are continually marketed under the notion that a vagina is dirty and smelly. In Canadian political leadership, we still don’t have a balance of gender in Parliament or Senate.

Furthermore, the marginalized realities of transgendered individuals are symptoms of a gender dichotomy that is inflexible, a product of a patriarchic system that still exists. For some reason it continues to be an insult to refer to a male as feminine, thus implying that it is somehow substandard to be female. We still need to work to swing the pendulum back to the center.

Many may wonder how, as a male, I have an interest or even a right to vocalize my thoughts on these matters. To this, I reply with a quote from second-wave feminist Betty Friedan: “Man is not the enemy here, but the fellow victim."

As such, I am robbed by the lack of female representation in government, and wonder how international conflict and climate change would be different if women had equal access to leadership. I am sorrowed by nonsensical vulnerabilities to HIV, sexual abuse, and poverty that females experience disproportionately. And finally, I care because I am a brother, son and friend. When my loved ones are marginalized by a system that limits opportunity and development, I hurt with them.

Gender inequity leaves us all at a disadvantage.

So this V-day (February 14th), many of us will buy chocolates and flowers and pink heart-shaped Hallmark cards for our sweethearts. But what about thinking outside prescribed Valentine notions? What about taking the “flower-fund” and giving it to a local women’s shelter or gender advocacy center? Or getting tickets to a local production of Eve Ensler’s famous play “The Vagina Monologues”? Celebrate by recognizing that V-day goes beyond vaginas, and honour the contributions and leadership that women have given.

Canada, let’s learn from our failure to see greatness in its many forms. In the end, “The Greatest Canadians” will be those who fight for the rights, equalities and dignities of all.






V-day is a global movement to stop violence against girls and women. For more information visit: vday.org.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Many may wonder how, as a male, I have an interest or even a right to vocalize my thoughts on these matters. To this, I reply with a quote from second-wave feminist Betty Friedan: “Man is not the enemy here, but the fellow victim."

So often I've refrained from expressing myself on these matters. I really do feel I have no right, and that I should restrict myself to queer issues. That quotation from Betty Friedan really struck me — an "AHA!" moment. Thanks for that. :)

Thai Jen said...

In a lovely ironic twist, I (the female and woman I am) will disagree.

Simply adding more women and stirring the pot won't change the recipe until these women are given real voices and real power. It's not enough to count the women in cabinet or the Top 10. One activist can do more than 20 token women on various boards.
When gender isn't a token, it can have the power to change.

I will love the reporter who doesn't say Hilary Clinton is the first woman candidate with a chance inthe first 30 seconds. Same about Obama (you know what i mean).

Anonymous said...

I agree with Jen, there shouldn't be a "count", I will be happy the day the most qualified person gets the job instead of a woman just becuase she's a woman or a man just because he is a man.

-Tiffany

Daniel Baylis said...

Great comments.

To clarify, I was not advocating for tokenistic female representation in government or on "Top 10" lists.

I am calling for an overhaul of values and beliefs. Why do males seem to have more influence in our cultural and political systems? How can we change this? Who is affected?

I am saying that I want women to have access to leadership and influence because we, as a society, value diverse sources of input and representation. This is my ideal.

Let's set this as a goal, and work towards it.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

add me to the list of vagina warriors.

"Instead we voted Don Cherry into the Top 10, and consequently administered a metaphorical slap across the face to every female in this nation."

well if you really think about it, this may have more to do with who the viewers of the "greatest canadian" are and less to do with feminism.

i.e. i believe the greatest canadian aired before or after hockey night in canada... also wayne greztky was #10...

maybe it has more to do with the reverence of hockey amongst the viewers of CBC.

Anonymous said...

Thanks Dan for being the man that you are. Men absolutely need to be putting these issues on whatever agendas they can and posing the questions you are posing. It makes me think of a wonderful little book: "Feminism Is For Everybody" by bell hooks. A few snippets from the back cover: 'hers is a vision of a beloved community that speaks to all those committed to equality, mutual respect, and justice. ...hooks encourages us to demand alternatives to patriarchal, racist, and homophobic culture,and to imagine a different future.' Seems to me that is what you are doing here. Cat